Skip to main content

Impact of Technology on Privacy Laws

 A fundamental right and the cornerstone of democracy, privacy is. According to Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, the right to privacy is recognised as a basic right in India. For the sake of preserving individual freedom, dignity, and autonomy, privacy is crucial. But in the age of technology, the idea of privacy has grown complicated and difficult. Data breaches, cyberstalking, and identity theft are just a few examples of the increased privacy infractions brought on by technological improvements. As a result, it is necessary to control how technology affects Indian privacy regulations.

The Information Technology Act, 2000 (IT Act) was passed to give transactions made via electronic data interchange and other forms of electronic communication legal status. The IT Act guarantees the security of sensitive personal data and personal information (SPDI). The IT Act further specifies penalties for hacking, data theft, and illegal access to computer systems. To address the issues brought on by technology improvements, the IT Act was modified in 2008, 2011, and 2013.

The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology introduced the Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019 (PDP Bill) in the Lok Sabha on December 11, 2019. (MeitY). The PDP Bill aims to establish a Data Protection Authority and to provide for the protection of personal data of individuals. The guiding ideas of the PDP Law are accountability, openness, and informed consent. Penalties for breaking the PDP Bill's rules are also included in its provisions.

Any information that can be used to directly or indirectly identify a person is referred to as personal data in the PDP Bill. According to the PDP Law, sensitive personal data includes information on passwords, finances, health, sexual orientation, biometrics, genetics, transgender status, caste or tribe, political or religious beliefs, or any other category of information designated by the Data Protection Authority. The PDP Law stipulates that personal data may only be processed with the data subject's express and informed consent. The PDP Law also guarantees the right to data portability, the right to be forgotten, and the right to have incomplete or erroneous data corrected.

Many people have criticised the PDP Bill for being too liberal on the government and providing it broad authority to exempt its agencies from the Law's requirements. The fact that the Bill establishes a Data Protection Authority with some degree of partial government control has also drawn criticism. A Joint Parliamentary Committee has been charged with further reviewing the Bill.

The Aadhaar Act, 2016, outlines the procedures for gathering and storing biometric and demographic information on Indian citizens in order to generate an Aadhaar—a special identifying number—for each of them. At India's Supreme Court, the Aadhaar Act has been contested on grounds of privacy breach. In its ruling in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors., the Supreme Court of India stated that privacy is a fundamental right protected by the Indian Constitution and that the Aadhaar Act only permits the collection and storage of biometric and demographic data with the individual's consent.

The State must make sure that no one's right to privacy is violated when using technology, according to the Supreme Court of India. The State must make sure that the use of technology and privacy protection are balanced, according to the Supreme Court of India.


In conclusion, technology has significantly impacted Indian privacy laws. The PDP Bill and the IT Act are significant initiatives to safeguard privacy in the digital age. The right of persons to privacy in the use of technology has also been significantly defended by the Supreme Court of India.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Effects of the #MeToo movement on Workplace Harassment Policies

 Workplace harassment regulations have undergone substantial modifications as a result of the #MeToo movement, which gained traction in 2017 and is still having an impact on public debate. The campaign, which emphasises sexual assault and harassment, has prompted more people to talk about their experiences and raised awareness of workplace practises and rules. An increased awareness of the widespread of workplace harassment has been one of the #MeToo movement's most important effects. Almost one in three women encounter sexual harassment at work, according to a survey by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. This subject has received attention due to the #MeToo movement, which also boosted public knowledge and discussion of the issue. Several businesses and organisations have improved their harassment rules in reaction to the campaign. The methods for reporting harassment should be strengthened, more training on harassment prevention should be offered, and harassment must ha...

Top 10 lawyers in India Net worth, Salary, Income, early life, career, personal life, relationship and many more

 H ere are the top 10 lawyers in India along with detailed headlines on their net worth, salary, income, early life, career, personal life, and relationship: 1. Mukul Rohatg i - Net Worth: Rs. 50 Crore; Career: Former Attorney General of India; Personal Life: Married with two children Mukul Rohatgi is a senior advocate who served as the Attorney General of India from 2014 to 2017. He has appeared in several high-profile cases, including the Aadhaar case and the Sabarimala temple case. He has a net worth of Rs. 50 crore and is married with two children. 2. Harish Salve - Net Worth: Rs. 128 Crore; Income: Rs. 6-15 Lakh per appearance; Career: Represented India in many international disputes; Personal Life: Divorced Harish Salve is a senior advocate who has represented India in several international disputes, including the Kulbhushan Jadhav case at the International Court of Justice. He charges between Rs. 6-15 lakh per appearance and has a net worth of Rs. 128 crore. He is divorced ...

Debate over mandatory vaccination laws

 With the COVID-19 epidemic, there has been a rise in interest in the long-running discussion over obligatory vaccination legislation. Laws requiring vaccinations make it necessary for people to have particular shots for themselves or their kids in order to go to school, work in certain occupations, or engage in other activities. Laws requiring vaccinations assert that the public's health must be protected. One of the best ways to stop the spread of infectious illnesses is through vaccinations. Mandatory vaccination laws make sure that a substantial portion of the population receives these shots, which helps to stop the spread of diseases like measles, mumps, rubella, and chickenpox. Advocates contend that legislation requiring vaccination are vital to safeguard vulnerable groups, including the elderly, children, and those with compromised immune systems who may not be able to receive vaccinations. Laws requiring vaccinations are opposed on the grounds that they violate people'...